Today in CSS:
We all know you can change the highlight colour of selected text, but it's impossible to animate that colour.
Unless…
the colour was just a variable inherited from the parent element, using @property to make it animatable…
Hahahahaha…
If the web platform is standardised then explain THIS
Favourite CSS property that sounds like an early-10s videogame marketing term is probably "touch-action"
Do you ever just look at a CSS tech demo that implements some neat gradient-based transition effect using pure CSS, and think to yourself "a plain image in a data URI has to be smaller than this"
Going into the webdev laboratory (i.e. pressed F12) to see how color-mix() in CSS works with getComputedStyle(). Can it simply get you the fully computed colour? It seems: yes, it can! But it's in the format of the color model you mixed with.
They're adding a CSS value called "pretty"? That's the best name they could come up with? The text wrapping is "pretty"?? Why not give up the pretense and call it "good" or "epic" or "awesomesauce" or something
Me: "Dang, CSS text rendering tech has gotten really snazzy lately. I wonder what new properties they used to make that white outline so–"
Dang, the latest CSS they've added is unbelievable. They added a property that does this?!
*I check browser support and find it was added in Firefox 1.0* Oh………………………………………
